Restrictions on use of background checks

New restrictions on use of criminal background checks in hiring are now in place. The new law in Oregon and the ordinance recently passed by the Portland City Council both went into effect on January 1, 2016. In popular language the legislation is referred to as “ban the box” legislation, referring to the box in [...]

By |2017-05-14T00:28:55+00:00May 10th, 2016|Background Checks, Ban The Box, Business Law, Criminal Background Checks, Employment Law, General|Comments Off on Restrictions on use of background checks

The Noncompetition Agreement in Oregon – an Overview

1. Introduction A noncompetition agreement in the employment context is a contract under which the employee agrees not to compete against the employer for a specified period, usually within a specified geographic area. Although a noncompetition agreement can be a separate agreement, non-competition clauses are sometimes part of a broader contract. The use of the [...]

By |2017-05-14T00:56:07+00:00January 20th, 2016|Employment Law, Employment Litigation, Non-Competition, Non-Competition Agreement, Noncompetition Agreement|Comments Off on The Noncompetition Agreement in Oregon – an Overview

Oregon Employees May Discuss Wages

In 2015 Oregon enacted House Bill 2007 which protects employee discussion of wages. The law applies to all employees, not only non-supervisory and non-managerial employees. The new law goes into effect January 1, 2016. Specifically, the new law provides: “It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer to discharge, demote or suspend, or to [...]

By |2017-05-14T01:04:38+00:00November 9th, 2015|Discrimination, Employment Law, Retaliation|Comments Off on Oregon Employees May Discuss Wages

Oregon Mandates Employee Mandatory Paid Sick Leave

The 2015 legislature adopted Senate Bill 454 which mandates paid sick leave for employees of employers that employ 10 or more employees in the state (or at least 6 if located in Portland). The law requires a policy that either front-loads the employees with at least 40 hours of paid sick time at the beginning [...]

By |2017-05-14T01:06:42+00:00October 20th, 2015|Employment Law|Comments Off on Oregon Mandates Employee Mandatory Paid Sick Leave

Oregon Cuts Employment Non-Competition Agreements to 18 Months

Governor Kate Brown signed House Bill 3236 into law. The effect is that in the employment context, 18 months is now the maximum length of time that a non-competition term can last pursuant to an agreement entered into at the time of employment or a bona fide promotion.  That changes Oregon law, which previously set [...]

By |2017-05-14T01:08:47+00:00October 14th, 2015|Employment Law|Comments Off on Oregon Cuts Employment Non-Competition Agreements to 18 Months

Oregon Court of Appeals Noncompetition Law Update

Noncompetition Agreement Update – Oregon Court of Appeals: Employment Noncompetition Agreement voidable, but not void, under ORS 653.295 if employee not notified of noncompetition term two weeks prior to employment: That was the holding of Bernard v. S.B., Inc., 270 Or App 710 (2014). The employee in that case contended that a noncompetition agreement was [...]

By |2017-05-13T22:43:23+00:00July 27th, 2015|Employment Law|Comments Off on Oregon Court of Appeals Noncompetition Law Update

Do Not Overlook Whistleblower Laws

An employee is sometimes protected against retaliation for making reports of improper company conduct or improper conduct by another employee. While other laws pertaining to discrimination or retaliation may also apply, the key question in these cases is what constitutes whistleblowing. In Oregon, an employee may be protected for reporting either internally (within the company) or externally [...]

By |2017-05-13T22:49:01+00:00August 11th, 2011|Employment Law|Comments Off on Do Not Overlook Whistleblower Laws

State of Oregon Does not have Prejudgment Creditor Status to Punitive Damage Award

I usually do not find opinions where the plaintiff and defense bar were presumably arguing the same basic position. But there is such a recent Oregon Supreme Court Opinion. In Patton v. Target Corporation, Plaintiff alleged that he was demoted then fired by Target

By |2017-05-13T22:54:54+00:00December 20th, 2010|Employment Law|Comments Off on State of Oregon Does not have Prejudgment Creditor Status to Punitive Damage Award

Oregon Supreme Court Rules Quitting Probationary Teacher Entitled to Unemployment

The Oregon Supreme Court issued an opinion on August 5, 2010 that a first year high school teacher who had been told that he would be discharged if he did not resign, and who subsequently quit, quit for good cause. Therefore he was entitled to unemployment. The case is McDowell v. Employment Dept., and a [...]

By |2017-05-13T22:56:49+00:00August 18th, 2010|Employment Law|Comments Off on Oregon Supreme Court Rules Quitting Probationary Teacher Entitled to Unemployment

Non-Solicitation Agreements Have Statutory Approval

While the Oregon legislature has severely restricted the use of noncompetition agreements in the employment context, under a law adopted effective January 1, 2008 (ORS 653.295), the law now specifically states that the restrictions do not apply to agreements “not to solicit employees of the employer or solicit or transact business with customers of the [...]

By |2017-05-13T22:59:45+00:00February 9th, 2009|Employment Law|Comments Off on Non-Solicitation Agreements Have Statutory Approval
Go to Top